Uncategorized

You are currently browsing the archive for the Uncategorized category.

We’ve now chosen the schools to take part in I’m a Scientist, Get me out of Here! March 2010. 70 teachers, in every setting from selective grammar schools to young offender institutions, will be logging on with their students and talking to real scientists. Then those students will be choosing which scientist gets a public engagement grant of £500.  Nothing engages young people like giving them some power.

Choosing the schools has been agonising as we’d love to include everyone but we’ve been very over-subscribed with five classes wanting to take part for every space. We’ve tried to ensure a mix of types of school, types of class and school location.

Many teachers wanted to take part with a whole year group (or two or three whole year groups in some cases!), which is great. We know from I’m a Councillor that getting the whole year group involved really adds to the buzz about the event and has students talking about it outside the classroom. However, as March is a fairly small scale event we have restricted it to one or two classes per school.

I hope that the teachers will see March as a way to test out the event, and then take part in June with many more classes. We know that having seen it in action once helps teachers make the most out of the event the second time.

Teachers can now register their interest in the June event

Scientists

We are still taking registrations for scientists who want to take part in March. We’ll close registrations and choose the scientists next Friday (19th Feb). So far all sorts of fascinating scientists have signed up. Here’s just a few of the things they are studying:-

  • Climate change in Antarctica
  • What happened just after the big bang
  • Undersea volcanoes
  • The origins of co-operative behaviour
  • The molecular basis of schizophrenia
  • Ways to reduce the use of animals in research

And loads more! Choosing the scientists next week is going to be every bit as agonising… But, there’s still plenty of time to sign up if you are interested in taking part. Please pass it on to any scientists you think may be interested.

Info for scientists here

Registration for scientists here

… But you can download copies from here. Sorry for the terrible pun.

Again we’ve been amazed by the response. We had so many orders within the first week that since then we’ve restricted it to one copy per teacher. But really, you only need one copy to run the activity with a class, so no-one should be too inconvenienced. You may want to laminate the cards for durability in teenage hands.

Thanks to everyone who’s ordered one. And all who’ve given us fantastic feedback on them. It does give me a warm glow to know that so many teachers and colleagues in the field see what we are trying to do with them, and think they really work!

A quick note on how this kit differs from the last one

Teachers gave us some great feedback on the first kit (thanks everyone!), but when we asked if there was anything they didn’t like they raised the following issues:-

Some felt the cards could be a little more durable

We have therefore printed this second set on heavier stock. There’s a limit to what we can do within the budget though, so I would recommend laminating the cards if you are concerned about this.

Most liked the design but some suggested they should be more colourful

We have jazzed up the design of the cards slightly but not made too many changes.

A couple of teachers suggested the cartoons were a bit young for the intended age group and suggested more sophisticated ones or photos

For various reasons we decided not to go with photos, however, we have gone for more ‘adult’ looking cartoons for the characters. (Not adult in the X rated sense…)

One teacher pointed out that characters might raise personal issues for some students (i.e. one character was a cancer patient), or for younger students (the teacher reported that her year 8 students were embarrassed by having to play a lesbian couple), and that flagging these possibilities to teachers would be helpful.

We recognise that this was an oversight on our part, as busy teachers may not read all the cards before the activity and spot potential issues. With the cancer patient clearly hearing about this character might upset some students due to their personal circumstances. There may be occasions when teachers feel it is appropriate to miss out this character. If you also miss out one of the ‘for’ characters too this should not affect the overall activity.

Student awkwardness, on the other hand, isn’t a reason to avoid topics, but it may need to be recognised and perhaps addressed. We have made sure with this kit that we have flagged potential issues of any sort to teachers with a ‘guidance note’ so that they can be aware.

We think teachers themselves will be the best people to judge what their class (or individual students) might find difficult and how to handle that. Therefore we haven’t tried to tell teachers what they should do. But we will definitely in future flag all potential difficulties so they can be prepared.

A couple of teachers asked for more background info and perhaps definitions of terms used

We have expanded the background info for teachers, and divided this section up more clearly. However, we haven’t gone overboard – part of the point of the format is that a lot of information about the topic comes out during the course of the debate, from different characters played by students and not from the teacher.

We believe this makes it easier for students to assimilate as they go along and changes the classroom dynamic. As one teacher said about the IVF kit, “It made such a difference that we were finding things out together. And far more memorable for the kids.”

Some teachers felt the language used was too advanced

We’ve considered this, however, far more teachers said they thought it was pitched at just the right level. It’s not possible to write resources that will work for every age group and ability level. Sorry. Each character card has only approximately 100 words of text, if one or two of these are difficult then hopefully this can be an opportunity to expand the students’ vocabulary.

And finally…

I hope this is useful to you all. I will put more analysis of the teacher feedback up on the site later this month. I hope you all enjoy using the kits and they get your students talking as much as the first ones did.

302320765_6dfb2928a4_m

Is this man too clean?

I’m surprised, as so many teachers have suggested stem cells to me over the last few months, whenever I’ve talked to them about the debate kits. I was sure that was going to come out top. But ‘Are we too clean?’ snuck in at the last minute, and wiped the floor with all comers, if you’ll pardon a very weak pun.

I was once at a gig where a member of the audience shouted out the name of an obscure, early hit, as a request. The singer laughed into his microphone and said, ‘It’s all very well for you, you’ve only got to remember the title, I’ve got to remember the chords and all the words to the ******* thing!’

I feel a bit like that – it’s all very well for you lot, you just have to vote, now I have to research and write the damn thing! The more I think about it, the more it seems like a very big topic to do justice to in one debate kit…

I guess the areas I mentioned in the poll all need to go in there (i.e. antibiotics/antibacterial cleaners/resistant bacteria/allergies). Let me know in the comments if there is anything you particularly want the kit to cover, curriculum links you think are important, and so on.

Wish me luck!

(photo credit Attila Malarik)

So much so, we suggest you have other people’s say too! Or, to put it another way, the government are running a consultation on how to increase the engagement between science and society, and you can join in. Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Lots of people have written back to me with comments on the draft plans for the teacher packs. Thanks everyone!

Read the rest of this entry »

Tags: , , , , , , , ,